is it travel?

A travelog of sorts: Josh and Renate in the Americas

    

Wednesday, February 16, 2005

Porto Alegre, Brazil: The World Social Territory

Action
From January 26 - 31 Josh and I attended the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre, Brazil. This was the fifth World Social Forum, a congregation of people involved in social movements around the world meeting under the theme, “Another world is possible” and strategizing against neo-liberalism and for social justice.

Though there were around 150,000 participants, the organizers tried to create the feel of more intimate communities. The sessions were divided into eleven thematic groups. The physical layout of the site was divided into 11 parts as well, so I ended up spending much of my time in the tents where sessions grouped under the theme “Human rights and dignity for a just and egalitarian world.” In addition to tents where sessions were held, the cluster of tents for each theme included internet tents, art exhibits and a space where various groups offered brochures and information about their organizations. Most importantly, every cluster of tents included a line of Port-A-Potties, which to the best of my knowledge were always fairly clean.


Sign marking the human rights section, where I spent most of my time. Tents from another section. This was taken the last day when the site was the most empty. Usually there were more people out.

As a participant, I received a tote bag made by a local cooperative. On the third day of the forum, the strap to my bag broke. I had remembered seeing some sewing machines by a food tent the day before, so I decided to head over there. After a friendly Spanish/Portuguese conversation, two women from a sewing cooperative repaired my bag free of charge.

In fact, all the services, from the construction of site to food services were provided by cooperatives. Even the computer software in the internet tents throughout the site used open source software instead of Microsoft products.

Reflection
During my time at the World Social Forum, I was most impressed with the infrastructure of the site. From basic things to easy access to bathrooms (as I was recuperating from an intestinal infection, this was important to me) to the attempt to make a gigantic event feel more friendly and navigable, I felt like the organizers succeeded in creating a comfortable temporary community. The infrastructure was even more meaningful to me, because behind the physical plan, was the ideological goal of presenting a viable alternative to capitalism. For six days I participated in a world where services were provided by people who also take part in the management of their businesses, and if something broke, it was repaired free of charge. The attention to an infrastructure based on an equitable economy also legitimized the event for me, because the organizers had the integrity to create a microcosm of the world they were fighting for.

Question
When have you been in an environment that resembles the world you want to live in?

10 Comments:

  • At 9:07 PM, Jen said…

    Okay, this is sad. I'm trying to think of some time with some group or something . . . I spend most of my day at work, working for corporate america. You can read my blog and see why that's not an ideal. I can't think of any. That's really sad.

    I would say something like the environment surrounding the triathlon or 1/2 marathon I did - usually that's a group of people who are pretty supportive of each other. But after my triathlon, I had to listen to these 2 guys complain about how slow some of us were going . . . they looked they could use some exercise themselves, and I did NOT appreciate their negativity on the day of my first (and only, so far) triathlon.

    Question though - I've heard of Neo-conservatives, but what's a neo-liberal? I mean, I'm sure I can guess, but in what context did this event mean? Enquiring minds want to know :)

     
  • At 10:26 AM, lernerm said…

    When I'm hiking in the woods, but maybe that's a copout, because there aren't any other people around (ideally). I'd have to say that the times when I've been in an environment is that most resembles my ideal world have been during special times - protest marches, festivals, times of crisis (blackouts), etc. - when people are able to temporarily put aside the capitalist/materialist mindset. Alas, these have only been brief interludes, much as your experience was, but it's nice to have glimpses of what could be.

     
  • At 11:17 PM, josh said…

    To respond to Jen’s question, neoliberalism is the dominant economic and political ideology in the world now. In brief, it advocates reducing government involvement in society and encouraging reliance on the “free market” to promote development. It assumes that a world of rational, competitive individuals pursuing personal gains will result in the greatest human progress. Much US domestic and foreign policy has been driven by the logic of neoliberalism for the past 30 years.

    For a more detailed description, see Wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NeoliberalismAnd here’s a less neutral perspective:
    http://www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/econ101/neoliberalism.htmlIncidentally, this relates to a blog that I almost wrote in Ecuador, about free trade agreements. The basic premise was that free trade agreements and neoliberalism are practically everyday words in most of Latin America, while most US citizens don’t even know what they mean. And that perhaps this isn’t surprising, since the end result of neoliberalism (increased money flows from less developed countries and poor people to more developed countries and rich people) often has devastating effects on Latin Americans while providing the wealth that enables high living standards in the US and other Northern countries…

     
  • At 11:24 AM, josh said…

    whoops, I forgot to mention the all-important questioning I was thinking of for my blog that didn't really happen:

    Why are people in the US less conscious of neoliberalism and free trade agreements? How have you or others you know become more aware of these issues?

     
  • At 2:51 AM, LAURA!! said…

    In response to renate:
    I adore libraries. I love the quiet, of course, but more than that, I love the possibilities. Endless. I love wandering the stacks. I feel so comfortable and happy. When I was a little girl, I used to fantasize about being locked into a library that adjoined to a candy shop for the weekend (a la Mixed up files of Mrs. B. F.) I guess it's that feeling of being taken cared of that you mentioned, Renate. I feel swaddled in old acquaintances and potential new friends. I know any rowdy people will get a disapproving look from the librarian. I know that things are alphabetized or dewey decimal-itized. That comforts me.
    I guess most of us like to feel comfortable and in our own milieu, whatever that may be.

     
  • At 10:37 AM, Jen said…

    Wow .. interesting. I think most americans haven't heard of neoliberalism because it's what americans think of as being conservative/republican - the free trade thing.

     
  • At 10:46 AM, Jen said…

    oh, and to answer your next answer . . . I'm not sure why americans aren't aware of trade agreements. I don't think they want to know. Some of the reporters were discussing our local businesses, and how, "well, the 'Buy Savannah' movement is ok and all, and some of those shops are nice, but I think people visiting Savannah want to buy things at stores they recognize - we need to get more high end chain stores in the downtown area."

    WHAT!!!??? Why would I travel so far to buy from the Gap, when I have one at home? I'm going to shop at a local store that is unique to that city, if I can. I mentioned in the conversation too, that I try to avoid Walmart, etc (which is getting increasingly hard to do). The response? Do I suddenly have 3 heads? Because that's how people looked at me.

    The general concensus . .. people don't want to know where their goods come from, as long as the can get them on special at WalMart.

    I've probably mentioned this before .. but I made a dress for a friend's new baby, and sent it as a gift. Everyone who saw it here liked it, and mentioned that I should make them and sell them, or asked if I would make one for them. Well, it cost me about $25 in supplies to make the dress and pinafore for a 6 month old. Add my labor onto that, 8 hours, and oh, let's just say only $10 an hour for easy rounding, and you are looking at a $105 outfit for a child to drool all over. Suddenly, no one was very interested in me making one for them.

    Adds to our 'throw away' mentality too. If you bought an outfit for a child that cost $105, you would damn sure keep it clean and mend it the best way you could. But if you can buy it for $10 because it was made in Taiwan ... you just throw it away and buy another.

    (I realize kid's clothes are a bad example though - they grow out of them so fast. But you get the idea).

     
  • At 12:25 PM, Renate said…

    I like Jen´s example of the baby outfit because it highlights another reocurring theme of our trip. People here in the (global) South are resentful because the relative wealth of us Gobal Northerners comes at their expense. For example, baby outfits are cheap at WalMart because the time of the sweatshop workers who make them isn´t "worth" as much as Jen´s time. If the work of a sewer in Taiwain, or a cotton picker or weaver (to make the fabric) were "worth" $10 an hour, then we´d all have to pay a lot more for our products at WalMart and consequently global northerners wouldn´t be quite so rich. It´s only because world economic policies value the work of Northerners more and Southerners less, that we Northerners can buy products that are so inexpensive they´re disposable.

     
  • At 4:52 PM, Jen said…

    not to dominate this topic .. but Renate reminded me of this.

    When people hear that I like to sew, they are AMAZED that I can do that. But at the same time, they don't want to pay more than $10 for a shirt at a store, and don't seem concerned by the working conditions of those in the textile industry. I try to point that out ... it's of value when I can do it, or someone around them can sew, but when some 3rd world country worker makes the shirt, it's not a valuable skill or commodity.

     
  • At 10:29 PM, lernerm said…

    lots of interesting comments! In response to Josh's query, I think that one reason why few Americans know about neoliberalism and how the WTO screws third world countries is because it's not taught in schools (except for a few colleges), nor is it on the nightly news, which is where most people get their info. And why isn't it on the news? Well, since the networks are part of the system, why should they report on something that might make people question the very system that supports their (profitable) existence? Kozol has pointed out in his book The Night Is Dark and I am Far From Home that the myth of no connections is one of the foundations of our modern capitalist society. If everytime Americans bought a $5 baby outfit at Walmart they were forced to watch a video in which it was made clear that the outfit cost $5 only because the people who made it are not paid a living wage, perhaps they might be willing to pay the extra few bucks for an outfit made at a union shop that pays a living wage. If Americans were aware of the connection between the hamburger they eat and the way in which it is produced, perhaps we'd have more vegetarians. If Americans were aware of the connection between the gas that costs them $1.90 a gallon instead of $4 a gallon, and the way in which this low price is the result of US support for corrupt regimes in Saudi Arabia and the like, perhaps more people would ride the train. Perhaps what we need is for Michael Jackson to speak about neoliberalism at his trial - I think that might be the only way to get the point across - at least it would make prime time tv.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home